Monday, May 09, 2005

Krugman on Social Security

Seemingly alone among writers for our major papers, Paul Krugman takes the time to analyze what the President says his Social Security plan is, rather than just printing the high points according to the White House. So what has Krugman found now?
"Suppose you're a full-time Wal-Mart employee, earning $17,000 a year. You probably didn't get any tax cut. But Mr. Bush says, generously, that he won't cut your Social Security benefits.

Suppose you're earning $60,000 a year. On average, Mr. Bush cut taxes for workers like you by about $1,000 per year. But by 2045 the Bush Social Security plan would cut benefits for workers like you by about $6,500 per year. Not a very good deal.

Suppose, finally, that you're making $1 million a year. You received a tax cut worth about $50,000 per year. By 2045 the Bush plan would reduce benefits for people like you by about $9,400 per year. We have a winner!

I'm not being unfair. In fact, I've weighted the scales heavily in Mr. Bush's favor, because the tax cuts will cost much more than the benefit cuts would save. Repealing Mr. Bush's tax cuts would yield enough revenue to call off his proposed benefit cuts, and still leave $8 trillion in change."
Oh my goodness, you mean the President's economic policies favor the rich? Who would ever have thought it?
|
Weblog Commenting and Trackback by HaloScan.com